Neil Ackerman v. Pfister et al
Petitioner: Neil Ackerman
Respondent: Randy Pfister
Case Number: 1:2014cv09802
Filed: December 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Livingston
Presiding Judge: James B. Zagel
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, Petitioner's Motion is denied. All pending motions are terminated and this matter is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by the Honorable James B. Zagel on 8/1/2016. Mailed notice(ep, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neil Ackerman v. Pfister et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Neil Ackerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randy Pfister
Represented By: Eldad Zvi Malamuth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?