Bellamy v. The City of Chicago et al
Kasandra Bellamy |
The City of Chicago, Haywil, LLC, Hillel Watkins, Isaac Benson, Bernard Wysinger and Maria Viti |
1:2015cv02678 |
March 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Edmond E. Chang |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 216 MOTION by Plaintiff Kasandra Bellamy for judgment on Plaintiff's Petition for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Turkcan, Kevin) |
Filing 192 ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Order, the motion for attorney's fees and costs 157 is granted in part and denied in part. There is follow-up work for the parties in light of the Order: Defendants are directed to calculate the total time that each attorney spent drafting and reviewing emails, and then to provide those calculations (along with the identity of the objected-to entries) to Bellamy by 09/08/2017. The parties must then file a joint position paper by 09/22/2017 identifying any disagreement as to the calculation. The Court will then apply the email reduction to the hours billed, multiply those hours by hourly rates to calculate the lodestar, reduce that lodestar figure by 20%, and enter final judgment as to the amount of attorneys' fees due to Bellamy. To track the case only (no appearance is required), a status hearing is set for 09/29/2017 at 8:30 a.m.Emailed notice(slb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.