Payne v. Astrue

Defendant: Lyle E Payne and Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 3:2012cv00969
Filed: September 5, 2012
Court: Illinois Southern District Court
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Franklin
Referring Judge: Clifford J. Proud
Presiding Judge: William D. Stiehl
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 6, 2014 22 Opinion or Order of the Court CLERK'S JUDGMENT reversing the final decision of the Commissionerof Social Security and remanding this case. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 2/5/2014. (slj)
June 16, 2014 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 23 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 6/16/2014. (mtm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lyle E Payne
Represented By: Charles E. Binder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Jennifer D.L. Hudson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.