Bethea v. Vienna Correctional Center

Bethea v. Vienna Correctional Center

Plaintiff:	Tyrone Bethea
Defendant:	Vienna Correctional Center
Case Number:	3:2013cv00640
Filed:	July 3, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office:	East St. Louis Office
County:	Pope
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Reagan
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 6, 2013	Filing 12 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams, granting 3 and 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tyrone Bethea. COUNT 2 is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may b e granted. COUNT 3 is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendant DAVIS: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/6/2013. (tjk)
July 3, 2013	Filing 1 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER severing case from 13-629-MJR. Plaintiff is ADVISED that if, for any reason, he does not wish to proceed with the newly-opened case, he must notify the Court in writing within 35 days. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed on the Vienna claims, he must submit an amended complaint, naming the individual Defendants responsible for the alleged unconstitutional actions within 35 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/2/2013. (tjk)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 6, 2013

Filing 12 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams, granting 3 and 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tyrone Bethea. COUNT 2 is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may b e granted. COUNT 3 is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendant DAVIS: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/6/2013. (tjk)

July 3, 2013

Filing 1 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER severing case from 13-629-MJR. Plaintiff is ADVISED that if, for any reason, he does not wish to proceed with the newly-opened case, he must notify the Court in writing within 35 days. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed on the Vienna claims, he must submit an amended complaint, naming the individual Defendants responsible for the alleged unconstitutional actions within 35 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/2/2013. (tjk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bethea v. Vienna Correctional Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Vienna Correctional Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Bethea
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?