James v. Harrington et al
Plaintiff: Julius James
Defendant: Richard Harrington, Salvador Godinez and Unknown Party
Case Number: 3:2014cv00463
Filed: April 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Livingston
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Frazier
Presiding Judge: J. Phil Gilbert
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Court hereby REJECTS the Report, but ADOPTS theRecommendation in its entirety (Doc. 62 ) based on the reasons stated above. Plaintiffs Motion (Doc. 50 ) for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/24/2015. (jdh)
October 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, denying 58 MOTION Relief from Judgment or Order filed by Julius James. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/27/2015. (jdh)
September 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 46 ) and GRANTS Defendants Roger Pelker and Shane Quandts Motion (Doc. 31 ) for Summary Judgment. Defendants Roger Pelker and Shane Quandt are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly at the conclusion of this matter. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/23/2015. (jdh)
January 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court adopts in its entirety 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, grants 18 MOTION for Leave to File filed by Julius James,but didmisses the claim against Sherry Benton. The Court denies as premature 21 MOTION to In form the Courts filed by Julius James and grants 22 MOTION to Stay Dispositive Motion Deadline. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to file Plaintiff's amended complaint and add defendants Pelker and Quandt in place of John Doe defendants and serve these defendants in accordance with the merits review order (doc.8) Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/21/2015. (jdh, )
May 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier, denying 6 MOTION to Inform Courts filed by Julius James. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/16/2014. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v. Harrington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julius James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Harrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Salvador Godinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?