Woolridge v. Cross et al
| Joshua Todd Woolridge |
| K. Bowers, James N. Cross and J. Doerer |
| 3:2014cv01077 |
| October 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Bond |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Defendants CROSS, BOWERS, and DOERER are also dismissed with prejudice. The dismissal of this case shall not count as one of Plaintiff's allotted strikes under 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(g). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/2/2014. (tjk). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/2/2014. (tjk, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joshua Todd Woolridge. Failure to pay the full filing fee within twenty-one (21) days shall result in dismissal of this case. In addition, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE , no later than 21 days from the date of this Order why this Court should not sanction him for fraudulent litigation conduct by dismissing his complaint with prejudice, based on his omission of his entire litigation history from the complaint. I f the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to show cause why he should not be sanctioned, an order shall be entered dismissing the complaint with prejudice, and this case shall be closed. (Action due by 11/24/2014). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/3/2014. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
