In Re: Jill Annette Gonzalez, Bankruptcy of

Plaintiff: Yongping Zhou
Defendant: Jill A Gonzalez
Case Number: 1:2009cv00291
Filed: October 26, 2009
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Robert L Miller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 6, 2010 18 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL re 1 Bankruptcy Appeal, filed by Yongping Zhou DISMISSING appeal for lack of jurisdiction; DENYING 17 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Yongping Zhou. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 5/6/10. (jcp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Jill Annette Gonzalez, Bankruptcy of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yongping Zhou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jill A Gonzalez
Represented By: Robert O Beymer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.