Fike v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Cecil W Fike |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2011cv00168 |
| May 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| De Kalb |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Retirement and Survivors Benefits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 33 MOTION for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act by Plaintiff Cecil W Fike. Attorney fees awarded in the amount of $9,171.81 as outlined in Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 8/23/12. (cer)
|
|
Filing
32
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with this Opinion. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Pla Cecil W Fike and against Dft Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 4/11/2012. (kjm)
|
|
Filing
28
OPINION AND ORDER REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with this Opinion. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Pla Cecil W Fike and against Dft Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 4/10/2012. (lns)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
