Casterline v. Heritage Aggregates et al

Defendant: Meshberger Brothers Stone Corporation and Heritage Aggregates
Plaintiff: Warren Casterline
Case Number: 1:2014cv00030
Filed: January 31, 2014
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Wells
Referring Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29:2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Casterline v. Heritage Aggregates et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meshberger Brothers Stone Corporation
Represented By: Anthony M Stites
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heritage Aggregates
Represented By: Matthew Alan Brown
Represented By: John T Neighbours
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren Casterline
Represented By: Paul A Logan
Represented By: John H Haskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.