Catt et al v. Affirmative Insurance et al
Plaintiff: Michael Skeans, Cindy Skeans and Brian Catt
Defendant: Affirmative Insurance Company
Mediator: Ronald P Kuker
Case Number: 2:2008cv00243
Filed: August 26, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Paul R Cherry
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER denying as moot 36 Rule 56 Motion to Strike ; accepting with modification 38 Judge Cherry's Report and Recommendation, overruling 41 Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge Decision by a District Judge and granting 13 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 2/3/10. (kjp)
July 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court RECOMMENDS that the District Court DENY AS MOOT 36 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike 35 Supplement or, in the Alternative, Plaintiffs' Response to the Defendant's Supplement filed by Michael Skeans, Bri an Catt, Cindy Skeans and DENY AS MOOT 29 MOTION for Hearing re: 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Skeans, Brian Catt, Cindy Skeans, and GRANT 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Affirmative Insurance Company. Objections to R&R due by 8/7/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 7/21/09. (kjp)
April 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 OPINION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Granting in part, denying in part and denying in part as moot 24 MOTION for Protective Order Relating to Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition(s) filed by Affirmative Insurance Company. Discovery deadline is extended to 6/15/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 4/30/09. (kjp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Catt et al v. Affirmative Insurance et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Skeans
Represented By: Timothy F Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cindy Skeans
Represented By: Timothy F Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Catt
Represented By: Timothy F Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Affirmative Insurance Company
Represented By: Robert F Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Mediator: Ronald P Kuker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?