Vega et al v. Caldwell et al
| Diana Vega, I V, S W and D V |
| Ramon Caldwell, Exxon Mobile Corp and Collins Pipeline Company |
| 2:2013cv00043 |
| January 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER denying 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute. The court ORDERS the plaintiffs to pay the reasonable expenses and attorneys fees associated with bringing this motion. The defendants are DIRECTED to file a bill costs indi cating their reasonable expenses and attorneys fees within fourteen days of this order. Additionally, the plaintiffs are ORDERED to file their amended complaint within seven days of this order. Furthermore, the plaintiffs are warned that this case will be dismissed for failure toprosecute pursuant to Local Rule 41-1 if they further delay this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 1/30/2015. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
19
OPINION AND ORDER denying 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution or, in the alternative, Motion to Compel filed by Exxon Mobile Corp, Ramon Caldwell Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 6/13/14. (kjp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
