CouponCabin LLC v. Does 1 through 10
| CouponCabin LLC |
| Does 1 through 10 |
| 2:2014cv00039 |
| February 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Computer Fraud and Abuse Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 116 MOTION (First) to Quash Subpoena and for Entry of Protective Order by Movant Wipro Ltd. The Subpoena served by CouponCabin LLC on Wipro Ltd is QUASHED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 2/10/17. (cer)
|
|
Filing
136
OPINION AND ORDER denying 118 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 1/10/17. (nal)
|
|
Filing
126
OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 99 Motion to Sever and Transfer Venue, or in the Alternative, Dismiss Defendant Sazze, Inc.'s Counterclaim. Defendant's Counterclaim is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 11/17/2016. (tc)
|
|
Filing
120
OPINION AND ORDER: Counterclaimant Sazze Inc ORDERED to submit by 11/15/2016 a jurisdictional statement and supporting brief as outlined in Order. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 10/17/16. (cer)
|
|
Filing
115
OPINION AND ORDER: DENIES 92 MOTION to Seal Counterclaim by Defendant Sazze Inc; 98 MOTION to Seal CouponCabin's Answer and Associated Motion to Sazze's Counterclaim by Plaintiff CouponCabin LLC; 103 MOTION to Seal Opposition to Cou nterclaim Defendant Coupon Cabin, LLC's Motion to Sever and Transfer Sazze, Inc.'s Counterclaim and Declaration of Greg Kim In Support Thereof by Defendant Sazze Inc; and 110 MOTION to Seal [Motion for Leave to file Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant Sazze, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Sever and Transfer or Dismiss Defendant Sazze, Inc.'s Counterclaim] by Plaintiff CouponCabin LLC. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to UNSEAL docket entries 93, 99, 100, 101, 104, and 111. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 10/3/2016. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
87
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 65 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or, in the Alternative, MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendants Cox Target Media, Inc., Internet Brands, Inc., Linfield Media, LLC, Savings.com, Inc., Sazze Inc. Count II is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with leave to refile within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 6/8/2016. (lhc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CouponCabin LLC v. Does 1 through 10 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CouponCabin LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Kosc |
| Represented By: | Mark R Waterfill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 1 through 10 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
