Novak v. Thrasher et al
George Novak |
Valparaiso City of and Vicky Thrasher |
2:2015cv00048 |
February 9, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Hammond Office |
Porter |
Paul R Cherry |
Robert L Miller |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the Court DISMISSES the amended complaint 21 sua sponte for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to terminate this case. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 12/14/2017. (jss) |
Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, defendants' 24 motion to dismiss is DENIED. The Court, sua sponte, MOVES TO DISMISS the amended complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The parties are hereby GRANTED thirty days from the date of this order to file any argument or evidence that they believe to be relevant to the court's analysis of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/18/2017. (jss) |
Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTS 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Vicky Thrasher, Valparaiso City of. The court affords Mr. Novak 21 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 9/29/2016. (lhc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.