Firth et al v. Yahoo! Inc et al
| Robert Firth, Fan Action Inc and Blue and Gold Com |
| Yahoo! Inc, Tim Prister, Jack Freeman, Pete Sampson, Shannon Terry and Bobby Burton |
| 3:2010cv00075 |
| March 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| LaPorte |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Philip P Simon |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 REPLY in Support re 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Yahoo! Inc. (Patton, Clay) Modified text (Reply) on 3/31/2010 (ksc). |
Filing 18
ORDER granting 16 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michele Floyd PHV for Yahoo! Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 3/29/2010. (kds)
|
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to 9 MOTION to Dismiss, 8 MOTION to Dismiss, 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Robert Firth. (Bernacchi, Doug) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting 13 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David A Fardon PHV for Bobby Burton and Shannon Terry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 3/15/10. (ksc)
|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support of 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jack Freeman, Tim Prister, Pete Sampson. (Agostino, Peter) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Jack Freeman, Tim Prister, Pete Sampson. (Agostino, Peter) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION for Attorney David A Fardon to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Shannon Terry, Bobby Burton ; Receipt #3345468. (sdf) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF in Support of 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Bobby Burton, Shannon Terry. (Chapman, James) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Bobby Burton, Shannon Terry. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (removed for court users only)(Chapman, James) Modified on 3/11/2010 (smp). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Yahoo! Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H)(Patton, Clay) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark R Waterfill on behalf of Bobby Burton, Shannon Terry (Waterfill, Mark) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Bobby Burton, Shannon Terry re 2 Notice of Removal,, Consent to Removal (Chapman, James) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by James B Chapman, II on behalf of Bobby Burton, Shannon Terry (Chapman, James) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF JOINDER by Jack Freeman, Tim Prister, Pete Sampson regarding 2 Notice of Removal,,. (Agostino, Peter) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter J Agostino on behalf of Jack Freeman, Tim Prister, Pete Sampson (Agostino, Peter) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Tim Prister, Yahoo! Inc, Pete Sampson, Shannon Terry, Jack Freeman, Bobby Burton from from St. Joseph Circuit/Superior Court, case number 71D061002 Ct. 00022. ( Filing fee $ 350), filed by Tim Prister, Yahoo! Inc, Pete Sampson, Shannon Terry, Jack Freeman, Bobby Burton. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A Complaint from St. Joseph Circuit/Superior Court, # 3 Exhibit B summons received by Yahoo from St. Joseph Circuit/Superior Court, # 4 Exhibit C copy of entire file from from St. Joseph Circuit/Superior Court)(sda) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bobby Burton, Jack Freeman, Tim Prister, Pete Sampson, Shannon Terry, Yahoo! Inc, filed by Fan Action Inc, Robert Firth, Blue and Gold Com. filed on 2/4/10 in St. Joseph Circuit/Superior Court, Case Number 71D061002 Ct. 00022.(sda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
