Press Ganey Associates Inc et al v. Dye
Press Ganey Associates Inc and PG Holdco LLC |
Reginald W Dye |
Reginald W Dye |
PG Holdco LLC and Press Ganey Associates Inc |
Vester Capital Partners V LP |
Reginald W Dye |
3:2012cv00437 |
August 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
St. Joseph |
James T Moody |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 126 OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 116 Motion to Stay pending appeal; denying 121 Motion for Review of Costs. Any amendment or supplement to Bill of Costs to be filed by 5/19/14; Dye may file any objections to amendment or supplement by 5/26/14.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 5/8/14. (jld) |
Filing 114 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING Press Ganey and PH Holdco's 87 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING Vestar's 86 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING Dye's 85 Motion for Summary Judgment. DENYING 95 Dye's Motion to Strike; D ENYING 103 Vestar's Motion to Strike. JUDGMENT entered in favor of Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Press Ganey and PG Holdco and Counterclaim Defendant Vestar in the amount of $92,685.06 plus costs. The Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial are VACATED and the case is TERMINATED. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 3/19/14. (jld) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.