Communitywide Federal Credit Union v. Laughlin

Appellant: Communitywide Federal Credit Union
Appellee: Lance W Laughlin
Case Number: 3:2013cv00353
Filed: April 25, 2013
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: South Bend Office
County: St. Joseph
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 25, 2014 15 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL re 1 Bankruptcy Appeal, filed by Communitywide Federal Credit Union. The Bankruptcy Court's 3/19/2013 Order is AFFIRMED. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 2/25/14. (smp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Communitywide Federal Credit Union v. Laughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Communitywide Federal Credit Union
Represented By: Andrea E Halpin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Lance W Laughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.