Franklin v. Fewell et al
Plaintiff: Printice Franklin
Defendant: S Fewell, D Betzner, D Mygrant and L Sutton
Case Number: 3:2013cv00673
Filed: July 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Nuechterlein
Nature of Suit: Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 82 Report and Recommendations of the magistrate judge; Court OVERRULES 84 plaintiffs objections and 83 Nurse L. Suttons objections; DISMISSES Officers Mygrant and Fewell from this ca se WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (a); and GRANTS Franklin up to and including July 31, 2015, to show cause why summary judgment should not be granted on his claim against Nurse Sutton for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 7/1/15. cc: Franklin (mc)
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 OPINION AND ORDER denying 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. Within 14 days of this order, the defendants are ordered to file a notice advising the court whether they wish to waive their exhaustion defense or proceed with a hearing. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/7/14. (smp)
August 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER re 1 Complaint granting plaintiff leave to proceed against Officer S Fewell, Officer D Mygrnat, and Nurse L Sutton in their individual capacities for monetary damages for failing to provide him adequate medical care; dismisses any and all other claims. Party D Betzner (Officer) terminated. USM to effect service. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 8/12/13. (smp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franklin v. Fewell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Printice Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S Fewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D Betzner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D Mygrant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L Sutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?