Woods v. Nusich et al
Derrick R Woods |
Timothy Nusich and Munster Indiana City of |
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
3:2014cv01900 |
September 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
LaPorte |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Robert L Miller |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING Derrick R. Woods leave to proceed against Officer Timothy Nosich in his individual capacity for monetary damages for violating his Fourth Amendment rights by using excessive force and falsely arresting and falsely impri soning Mr. Woods on 9/13/2012; and in his individual capacity for monetary damages for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress by using his taser on Mr. Woods on 9/13/2012; DISMISSING all other claims; and ORDERING Officer Timothy Nosich to respond, as provided for in the Fed R Civ P, only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 9/9/2015. (lhc) |
Filing 7 OPINION AND ORDER re 2 Pro Se Complaint filed by Derrick R Woods. Court GRANTS pltf leave to proceed against Officer Timothy Nusich in his individual capacity for monetary damages; DISMISSES the Town of Munster ; DIRECTS the United States Marshals Service to effect service of process on Officer Timothy Nusich. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 7/2/15. cc: Woods, USMS(mc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.