Ladyman v. Meade et al
| Craig C. Ladyman |
| Nicholas Meade, Ted Bohner, Arthur Smith, Shelley Gupta, Charles C Wicks, Jeanne R. Drust and Dean O. Burton |
| 3:2014cv02038 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James T Moody |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant Jeanne R. Drusts 87 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment against plaintiff Craig C. Ladyman on the amended complaint filed December 16, 2016 25 , reflecting that the claims against defendants Meade, Bohner, and Smith were dismissed with prejudice on April 28, 2017 36 , that the claims against defendant Gupta, Wicks and Burton were stricken on June 20, 2017 42 , that the John Doe and Jane Doe defendants were granted judgment on the pleadings on February 8, 2018 71 , and that defendant Drust has this day been granted summary judgment., ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 8/20/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(jld)
|
|
Filing
86
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff Craig C. Ladyman's "Revised Complaint for Compensatory and Punitive Damages, Injunctive and Declaratory Relief, and Demand for Jury Trial" DE 85 is STRICKEN as untimely filed without leave of Court. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/25/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
|
|
Filing
81
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 80 MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judge Decision by a District Judge re 75 Order Striking Document, filed by Craig C. Ladyman. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 5/31/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER DENYING 68 MOTION for Enlargement of Time and Set Aside Judgement by Plaintiff Craig C. Ladyman. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 12/14/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(sct)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court STRIKES claims against defendants Shelley Gupta, Charles C. Wicks, and Dean O. Burton from the amended complaint as redundant, immaterial and impertinent in light of the prior ruling of September 29, 2016 [DE 20 at 9] dismissing plaintiff Ladyman's claims against these defendants with prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/20/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION, ORDER AND NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: Court GRANTS 10 Motion to Dismiss but the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and with leave to amend. Ladyman must file an amended complaint against her as outlined by 10/31/2016, or the action agai nst Drust will be dismissed with prejudice and without further notice. Court GRANTS 12 Motion to Dismiss as to defendants Shelley Gupta, Charles C. Wicks, and Dean O. Burton, and the action against them is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The State De fendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to defendants Nicholas Meade, Ted Bohner, and Arthur Smith, but on its own motion the court raises the issue whether to dismiss the action against them with prejudice on grounds of res judicata, as the issues in Ladyman' s claims are precluded by his having litigated a motion to suppress and the finality of his conviction. Ladyman must file a responsive memorandum as outlined by 10/31/2016, or the action against Meade, Bohner and Smith wi ll be dismissed with prejudice and without further notice. Ladyman's 14 Motion to Strike has been treated as his response, and the clerk is to terminate its status as a pending motion. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/29/2016. cc: Ladyman (tc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
