York v Saint Joseph's College
Plaintiff: Mary York
Defendant: Saint Joseph's College
Case Number: 4:2014cv00087
Filed: December 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Lafayette Office
County: Tippecanoe
Presiding Judge: Paul R Cherry
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER : Saint Josephs 11 Motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claim for age discrimination is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 7/7/15. (mc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: York v Saint Joseph's College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary York
Represented By: James E Ayers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saint Joseph's College
Represented By: Christie B Bolsen
Represented By: Rachel E Yarch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?