ESG TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC v. ADVANTAGE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
| ESG TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC |
| ADVANTAGE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC. and SCHALLER ANDERSON OF ARIZONA, LLC |
| 1:2009cv00030 |
| January 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Negotiable Instrument Office |
| Marion |
| Tim A. Baker |
| William T. Lawrence |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the reasons set forth, the Court DENIES ESG's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in its entirety. (Dkt. 105 ). The Court GRANTS Advantage's Motion for Summary Judgment in regards to the third-pa rty breach of contract claim and DENIES the Motion in regards to ESG's discrimination claim. (Dkt. 84 ). The Court GRANTS Schaller Anderson's Motion for Summary Judgment in regards to the tortious inference claims and DENIES the Motion in regards to ESG's discrimination claim. (Dkt. 87 ). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/6/2011. (JD)
|
|
Filing
64
ENTRY ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS: For the reasons set forth above, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED as to Counts III, IV, VI, and VII, and DENIED as to Count V**SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 12/8/2009. (DWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
