DILLINGER, L.L.C. v. ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC. Featured Case
Plaintiff: DILLINGER, L.L.C.
Defendant: ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC.
Case Number: 1:2009cv01236
Filed: October 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
County: Morgan
Presiding Judge: David Frank Hamilton
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2011 Filing 227 NOTICE of Change of Address by R. James Slaughter (Slaughter, R.)
June 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 226 ORDER re: 225 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File file Bill of Costs and Motion for Assessment of Attorneys' Fees. Electronic Arts, Inc., is granted a 14 day enlargement of time to and including July 14, 2011, within which to file its Bill of Costs and Motion for the Assessment of Attorneys' Fees. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/29/2011. (LBK)
June 28, 2011 Filing 225 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to July 28, 2011 to file Bill of Costs and Motion for Assessment of Attorneys' Fees, filed by Defendant ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Elberger, Ronald)
June 16, 2011 Filing 224 FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/16/2011.(LBK)
June 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 223 ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint lists six counts, three of which (Counts I, II, and VI) have recently been dismissed. [Dkt. 222.] The three remaining claims (Counts III-V) arise under the Lanham Act and a common-law claim for unfair competition that is grounded in a prohibition against trademark misappropriation, which Plaintiff argues bars EA from using the Dillinger name in its games. [Dkt. 1 at 10-11.] Presently before the Court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment on EA's First Amendment defense to its use of the Dillinger name. [Dkt. 85; dkt. 144.] For the reasons detailed herein, the Court GRANTS EA's Motion for Summary Judgment on its First Amendment Defense with respect to all remaining claims, [dkt. 85], and further DENIES Plaintiff's Cross-Motion regarding the same, [dkt. 144]. Judgment shall enter accordingly. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/16/2011. (LBK)
June 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 222 ORDER re: 89 Defendant Electronic Art, Inc.'s ("EA's") Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. For the reasons detailed herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART EA's motion for judgment on the pleadings. [Dkt. 89.] The motion is granted with respect to Counts I, II, and VI. It is also granted with respect to Count III only to the extent that Count III alleges violations of state law. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Given that the Court has ruled in EA's favor with respect to Count I, several other motions can now be summarily resolved. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability Under Count I, [dkt. 152], is DENIED. EA's motion for a continuance to respond to Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, [dkt. 171], is DENIED AS MOOT. EA's motion to enjoin certain state court proceedings that might interfere with the Court's ability to resolve Count I, styled as its Motion to Enjoin State Court Action Dillinger, LLC v. Thompson, [dkt. 186], is DENIED AS MOOT, and the Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply to that motion, [dkt. 213], is likewise DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/15/2011. (LBK)
October 1, 2009 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC. with Jury Demand, filed by DILLINGER, L.L.C. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-The Godfather, # 2 Exhibit B-The Godfather II, # 3 Exhibit C-Firearms Legend)(NS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DILLINGER, L.L.C. v. ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DILLINGER, L.L.C.
Represented By: Jonathan G. Polak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?