ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. et al v. DUGDALE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
| ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC. and GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. |
| DOES and DUGDALE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |
| ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC. and GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. |
| DUGDALE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |
| 1:2010cv00278 |
| March 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Larry J. McKinney |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER Following 4/15/2010, Pretrial Conference: ORDER granting Pltf's 57 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Pltf shall have 21 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint; denying as moot Pltf's 81 Moti on for Extension of Time to File a Reply in Support of its Motion to Amend; granting in part and denying in part Deft's 83 Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted (see Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 4/19/2010. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
37
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Proceedings: Defendant's 15 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Service of Process. The Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Service of Process. (mg)[Transferred from California Central on 3/9/2010.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
