MAINSOURCE BANK v. NAMCO CYBERTAINMENT, INC. et al

Plaintiff: MAINSOURCE BANK
Defendant: NAMCO CYBERTAINMENT, INC. and ALAN L. ROLFES
Case Number: 1:2011cv00429
Filed: March 28, 2011
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Indianapolis Office
Referring Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAINSOURCE BANK v. NAMCO CYBERTAINMENT, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAINSOURCE BANK
Represented By: Scott Alan Kreider
Represented By: Brian Charles Hewitt
Represented By: Christopher C. T. Stephen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NAMCO CYBERTAINMENT, INC.
Represented By: Michael Rabinowitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALAN L. ROLFES
Represented By: Timothy Patrick Coriden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.