ROBERTS v. CENDANT MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: JAMES A. ROBERTS, SR.
Defendant: FEIWELL & HANNOY, P.C., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and CENDANT MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2011cv01438
Filed: October 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 CLOSED JUDGMENT-This case is dismissed without prej for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/7/2013 (dist made to pltf)(CBU)
March 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff shall have through March 21, 2012, in which to identify a plausible basis for invoking the court's limited jurisdiction over his claim of wrongful foreclosure. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/2/2012.(JKS)
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENTRY Discussing Motion for Temporary Restraining Order - For the reasons explained in this Entry, the 6 plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order must be denied. Roberts has not established a basis for injunctive relief in this case. He has not presented any argument or evidence to show that he lacks an adequate remedy at law. Moreover, he has not shown a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits. Thus, the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order 6 is DENIED. (SEE ENTRY). (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/31/2011. (JKS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROBERTS v. CENDANT MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEIWELL & HANNOY, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CENDANT MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES A. ROBERTS, SR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?