COLLINS v. DOES 1-11

Plaintiff: PATRICK COLLINS
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-11
Case Number: 1:2012cv01136
Filed: August 15, 2012
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 28, 2014 115 Opinion or Order of the Court ENTRY - Plaintiff's Notice of Withdrawal of the Stipulated Dismissal [Dkt. 74 ] is DISREGARDED, Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Stipulated Dismissal [Dkt. 108 ] is DENIED, and Defendants Stout and Ozkaya's Motion for Attorney's Fees [Dkt. 79 ] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/28/2014. (JD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COLLINS v. DOES 1-11
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRICK COLLINS
Represented By: Paul J. Nicoletti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-11
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.