HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC. et al v. STRYKER CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC., HILL-ROM COMPANY, INC. and HILL-ROM MANUFACTURING, INC.
Defendant: STRYKER CORPORATION doing business as STRYKER MEDICAL and STRYKER SALES CORPORATION
Counter Claimant: STRYKER CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2013cv00765
Filed: May 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Denise K laRue
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MARGINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Dismissal with prejudice acknowledged. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/21/2017.(APD)
July 20, 2017 Filing 11 NOTICE AND STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, filed by Defendants STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION (Lueders, Daniel)
April 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance. Attorney David K. Callahan withdrawn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 4/14/2014. (MAC)
February 26, 2014 Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney Appearance of David K. Callahan, filed by Plaintiffs HILL-ROM COMPANY, INC., HILL-ROM MANUFACTURING, INC., HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC., Counter Defendants HILL-ROM COMPANY, INC., HILL-ROM MANUFACTURING, INC., HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Callahan, David)
May 13, 2013 Filing 8 NOTICE of Final Determination in lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 ORDER directing administrative closure of case, filed 5/10/2013) (JKS)
May 13, 2013 Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Filing in lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 ORDER Directing New Case Assignment, filed 5/9/2013) (JKS)
May 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - The claims at issue in this action are stayed pending reexamination of the patents-in-suit by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). [Dkts. #1 ; #4 .] Given that the timing of any decision by the PTO is unknown, the Court directs the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action on the Court's docket. Consistent with the Court's Order granting the stay request, [dkt. #4 ], the parties are ORDERED to file any decisions by the PTO on the pending petitions for reexamination within 7 days of receiving those decisions. Either party may move to lift the stay or reopen this case after the PTO decides all of the pending motions for reexamination or at an earlier time if such a motion is supported by good cause. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/10/2013. (JKS)
May 10, 2013 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL STAY signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/20/2012 in Cause No. 1:11-cv-1120-JMS-DKL (docket No. 146). This Court Grants Stryker's motion for a partial stay pending reexamination by the PTO of six of the nine patents in suit -- U.S. Patent Nos. 5,771,511; 7,237,287; 7,568,246; 7,506,390; 7,520,006; and 7,669,263 (dkt 115). The parties are ORDERED to file any decisions by the PTO on the pending petitions for reexamination within 7 days of receiving those decisions. Either party may move to lift the stay after the PTO decides all of the pending motions for reexamination or at an earlier time if such a motion is supported by good cause. The Markman briefing on the three patents not subject to this stay remains under advisement and will be ruled on in due course.(DJH)
May 9, 2013 Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint and COUNTERCLAIM against HILL-ROM COMPANY, INC., HILL-ROM MANUFACTURING, INC., and HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC. filed by STRYKER SALES CORPORATION and STRYKER CORPORATION. Document was originally filed August 1, 2011 in the Western District of Wisconsin under Cause No. 3:11-cv-0251, and transfered to the Southern District of Indiana on August 16, 2011. (DJH)
May 9, 2013 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against STRYKER CORPORATION and STRYKER SALES CORPORATION filed by HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC., HILL-ROM MANUFACTURING, INC., and HILL-ROM COMPANY, INC. (Filing fee $350, receipt number 0758-737485) Complaint was filed in the Western District of Wisconsin on April 4, 2011 under Cause No. 3:11-cv-0251, and transferred to the Southern District of Indiana on August 6, 2011. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A U.S. Patent No. 5,771,511, #4 Exhibit B U.S. Patent No. 7,237,287, #5 Exhibit C - U.S. Patent No. 7,568,246, #6 Exhibit D - U.S. Patent No. 7,506,390, #7 Exhibit E - U.S. Patent No. 7,520,006, #8 Exhibit F - U.S. Patent No. 7,669,263, #9 Exhibit G - U.S. Patent No. 5,699,038, #10 Exhibit H - U.S. Patent No. 6,147,592, #11 Exhibit I - U.S. Patent No. 7,538,659, #12 Report on Filing Patent/Trademark Action)(DJH)
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/9/2013 in Cause No. 1:11-cv-1120-JMS-DKL (docket No. 166). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion (dkt. 162) is granted.... It is further ordered that all claims and counterclaims relating to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,771,511, 7,237,287, 7,568,246, 7,506,390, 7,520,006, and 7,669,263 (the "Network Patents") be and hereby are severed, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a new case number to the severed portion, assign that cause number to the assigned district judge and magistrate judge assigned to this action, and docket a copy of this Order as the first entry.... ***SEE ORDER***(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC. et al v. STRYKER CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Alicia L. Shah
Represented By: Andrew W. Hull
Represented By: David K. Callahan
Represented By: David G. Hanson
Represented By: Josh M. Reed
Represented By: Lynn Marie Stathas
Represented By: Mark A. Cameli
Represented By: Mary E. Zaug
Represented By: Paul D. Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HILL-ROM COMPANY, INC.
Represented By: Alicia L. Shah
Represented By: Andrew W. Hull
Represented By: David K. Callahan
Represented By: David G. Hanson
Represented By: Josh M. Reed
Represented By: Lynn Marie Stathas
Represented By: Mark A. Cameli
Represented By: Mary E. Zaug
Represented By: Paul D. Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HILL-ROM MANUFACTURING, INC.
Represented By: Alicia L. Shah
Represented By: Andrew W. Hull
Represented By: David K. Callahan
Represented By: David G. Hanson
Represented By: Josh M. Reed
Represented By: Lynn Marie Stathas
Represented By: Mark A. Cameli
Represented By: Mary E. Zaug
Represented By: Paul D. Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STRYKER CORPORATION doing business as STRYKER MEDICAL
Represented By: Anthony A. Tomaselli
Represented By: Benjamin J. Whiting
Represented By: Brian C. Swanson
Represented By: Christopher J. Lind
Represented By: Daniel James Lueders
Represented By: Holiday W. Banta
Represented By: J. Scott McBride
Represented By: Kristin Graham Noel
Represented By: Martha Jahn snyder
Represented By: Matthew R. Ford
Represented By: Steve Edward Zlatos
Represented By: Steven E. Derringer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STRYKER SALES CORPORATION
Represented By: Anthony A. Tomaselli
Represented By: Benjamin J. Whiting
Represented By: Brian C. Swanson
Represented By: Christopher J. Lind
Represented By: Daniel James Lueders
Represented By: Holiday W. Banta
Represented By: J. Scott McBride
Represented By: Kristin Graham Noel
Represented By: Martha Jahn snyder
Represented By: Matthew R. Ford
Represented By: Nikita S Williams
Represented By: Philip A. Whistler
Represented By: Steve Edward Zlatos
Represented By: Steven E. Derringer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: STRYKER CORPORATION
Represented By: Anthony A. Tomaselli
Represented By: Benjamin J. Whiting
Represented By: Brian C. Swanson
Represented By: Christopher J. Lind
Represented By: Daniel James Lueders
Represented By: Holiday W. Banta
Represented By: J. Scott McBride
Represented By: Kristin Graham Noel
Represented By: Martha Jahn snyder
Represented By: Matthew R. Ford
Represented By: Steve Edward Zlatos
Represented By: Steven E. Derringer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?