ACF 2006 CORP v. CONOUR et al
Plaintiff: ACF 2006 CORP
Defendant: COHEN & MALAD, LLP, WILLIAM F. CONOUR, CONOUR LAW FIRM, LLC, TIMOTHY F. DEVEREUX, JEFFREY A. HAMMOND and MARK C. LADENDORF ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C.
Case Number: 1:2013cv01286
Filed: August 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 191 ORDER denying 187 Motion to Amend/Alter Final Judgment. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/24/2017. (CBU)
September 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 185 ENTRY FOLLOWING MANDATE FROM THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS - For the reasons set forth in the Mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit entered on August 1, 2016: The Court enters Final Judgment against Plaintiff , ACF 2006 Corp. and directs that ACF 2006 Corp. take nothing by its claims asserted in this action. The Court enters Final Judgment in favor of Intervenors, David L. Beals, Sr., Loretta Beals, and Kristen Beals, by her Guardians David L. Beals, S r. and Loretta Beals, in the amount of $358,069.83. The Court orders appellate costs to be assessed against ACF 2006 Corp. in the amount of $500.00 payable to the Beals Intervenors, and an additional $500.00 payable to Ladendorf / Deve reux for costs assessed by the Court of Appeals. Judgment is entered against ACF 2006 Corp. in those amounts. The quantum meruit claim associated with the N.E. case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as unripe. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/19/2016.(JLS)
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 151 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL MARCH 9-10, 2015. For the reasons set forth in the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Court finds that, based upon the quantum meruit division of the attorney' ;s fees and expenses in the Subject Cases, ACF is entitled to a judgment in the amount of $774,797.28, which constitutes the amount of fees and expenses to which the Conour Firm would have been entitled to under Indiana law. Final judgment shall issue in an order separate from this Entry. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/25/2015.(MAC)
June 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ENTRY - STRIKING STIPULATION; The parties failed to provide the Court with the requested position statements regarding whether Keller & Keller and the Nunn Firm must be added as indispensable parties under Rule 19, and because the stipulation w as filed in violation of Local Rule 83-7(a), the Court hereby STRIKES the parties' stipulation. As stated in the Court's original entry requesting additional briefing, the parties of record are hereby ORDERED to each file a position statement. The parties' supplemental briefs are due within ten (10) days of the date of this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/12/2015.(CKM)
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ENTRY on Motion to Reconsider - Intervenors have not demonstrated that the Court committed a manifest error of law in finding that their interests are subordinate to the perfected security interest held by ACF with respect to the property at issue in this action. Therefore, Intervenors' Motion to Reconsider (Filing No. 121 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/24/2015. (TRG)
January 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Mr. Devereux's and the Ladendorf Firm's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 63 ) is GRANTED. ACF's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 59 ) is DENIED in part with respect to the claims against Mr. Devereux and the Ladendorf Firm, and GRANTED in part with respect to Mr. Conour, the Conour Firm, the Intervenors, Mr. Hammond, and Cohen & Malad. The Intervenors' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. [ 70]) is DENIED and their Complaint (Filing No. 55 ) is DISMISSED. The Intervenors' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Filing No. 88 ) is also DENIED. Recognizing that the parties have filed their final witness and exhibit list, (Filing No. 107, Filing No. 113 ) the parties have until February 6, 2015 to make any amendments to their lists. The final pretrial conference will be held as scheduled on February 11, 2015. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2015. (MGG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ACF 2006 CORP v. CONOUR et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ACF 2006 CORP
Represented By: Christopher Charles Hagenow
Represented By: Roger G. Jones
Represented By: Austin L. McMullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COHEN & MALAD, LLP
Represented By: Jeffrey Allen Hammond
Represented By: Gregory L. Laker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM F. CONOUR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CONOUR LAW FIRM, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIMOTHY F. DEVEREUX
Represented By: Timothy Francis Devereux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JEFFREY A. HAMMOND
Represented By: Jeffrey Allen Hammond
Represented By: Gregory L. Laker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK C. LADENDORF ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C.
Represented By: Mark C. Ladendorf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?