CONTOUR HARDENING, INC. v. VANAIR MANUFACTURING, INC.

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District CONTOUR HARDENING, INC. v. VANAIR MANUFACTURING, INC.

CONTOUR HARDENING, INC. v. VANAIR MANUFACTURING, INC.

Plaintiff:	CONTOUR HARDENING, INC.
Defendant:	VANAIR MANUFACTURING, INC.
Case Number:	1:2014cv00026
Filed:	January 9, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 23, 2016	Filing 101 ORDER. The Court GRANTS the parties' Joint Motion to Vacate Order on Initial Markman/Claim Construction Brief. [Filing No. 99.] The Clerk is directed to VACATE the Court's Claim Construction Order, [Filing No. 80], and the parties are ORDERED to file a stipulation of dismissal within thirty days. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/23/2016. (BGT)
September 2, 2015	Filing 80 ORDER. The definitions set forth in this Order will control the interpretation of the patent-in-suit going forward, and the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE the pending motion for Markman construction. [Filing No. 68.] The Court requests that the assigned Magistrate Judge assist the parties in the development of a Phase II Uniform Patent Case Management Plan. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/2/2015. (BGT)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 23, 2016

Filing 101 ORDER. The Court GRANTS the parties' Joint Motion to Vacate Order on Initial Markman/Claim Construction Brief. [Filing No. 99.] The Clerk is directed to VACATE the Court's Claim Construction Order, [Filing No. 80], and the parties are ORDERED to file a stipulation of dismissal within thirty days. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/23/2016. (BGT)

September 2, 2015

Filing 80 ORDER. The definitions set forth in this Order will control the interpretation of the patent-in-suit going forward, and the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE the pending motion for Markman construction. [Filing No. 68.] The Court requests that the assigned Magistrate Judge assist the parties in the development of a Phase II Uniform Patent Case Management Plan. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/2/2015. (BGT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CONTOUR HARDENING, INC. v. VANAIR MANUFACTURING, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: CONTOUR HARDENING, INC.
Represented By:	William A. McKenna
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: VANAIR MANUFACTURING, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?