NOBLE ROMAN'S INC. v. B & MP, LLC et al
Plaintiff: NOBLE ROMAN'S INC.
Defendant: B & MP, LLC and LESLIE PERDRIAU
Case Number: 1:2014cv00206
Filed: February 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 148 CLOSED TRANSFER - ENTRY ON MOTION TO TRANSFER: For the reasons set forth above, the Defendants' motion to transfer (Dkt. No. 127) is GRANTED, as is the Motion for Leave to File Bradley Perdriau's Declaration (Dkt. No. 137). The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 100) and Defendant Bradley Perdriau's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 123) remain pending ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 10/22/2015.(DW)
April 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER denying Defendants' 71 Amended Motion to Dismiss. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/3/2015. (BGT)
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS: For the reasons set forth above, the Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Count III (mistakenly titled Count Two) of Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Barry Avi ation, Inc. v. Land O'Lakes Mun. Airport Comm'n, 377 F.3d 682, 687 (7th Cir. 2004) ("The better practice is to allow at least one amendment regardless of how unpromising the initial pleading appears because except in unusual circumstan ces it is unlikely that the court will be able to determine conclusively on the face of a defective pleading whether plaintiff actually can state a claim.") (citations and quotation marks omitted). Plaintiff shall have fourteen days within which to file an amended complaint that complies with the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 10/8/2014. Copy sent via US Mail.(DW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NOBLE ROMAN'S INC. v. B & MP, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B & MP, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LESLIE PERDRIAU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NOBLE ROMAN'S INC.
Represented By: Steven Kenneth Huffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?