LUNDEEN v. RHOAD et al
Plaintiff: JAMES E. LUNDEEN, SR.
Defendant: STEPHEN HUDDLESTON, FRANCES L. KELLY, NICHOLAS RHOAD and AMBER SWARTZELL
Case Number: 1:2014cv00547
Filed: April 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER - Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss - This cause is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [Docket No. 39], filed on October 22, 2014 the motion is GRANTED; and the following pending mo tions denying as moot 46 Motion; denying as moot 54 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 60 Motion; denying as moot 61 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 64 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 66 Motion; denying as moot 69 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 71 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 74 Motion; denying as moot 75 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying as moot 79 Motion to Stay; This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants. *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 7/8/2015. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
December 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER denying 19 Motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/30/2014 (dist made) (CBU)
December 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying 32 36 and 28 - Plaintiff's "Motion for Entry of Default," "Motion to strike docket #30 for filing out of rule without leave," and "Verified motion to strike docket #34 and docket #35 pursuant to the inherent power of this Court." Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/9/2014 (dist made) (CBU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUNDEEN v. RHOAD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEPHEN HUDDLESTON
Represented By: Corinne T.W. Gilchrist
Represented By: Dino L. Pollock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANCES L. KELLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NICHOLAS RHOAD
Represented By: Corinne T.W. Gilchrist
Represented By: Dino L. Pollock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMBER SWARTZELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES E. LUNDEEN, SR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?