CARTER et al v. GENERAL MOTORS HOURLY-RATE PENSION PLAN et al
| PAUL A. BEATY, RICHARD A. BILLMAN, SR., MICHAEL CARTER, ODIS LONG and WILLIAM RUSSELL |
| GENERAL MOTORS HOURLY-RATE PENSION PLAN and GENERAL MOTORS LLC |
| 1:2014cv00564 |
| April 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER: Based on its de novo review of the Administrative Record, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have not been wrongly denied benefits under the GM Plan because they have not terminated em-ployment with Clutch-Allison. Additionally, Plainti ffs are not entitled to equitable relief under ERISA. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, [Fil-ing No. 54], is DENIED and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 60], is GRANTED. Final judgment will enter accordingly ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/23/2015. (DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
