LAMBRIGHT v. KNIGHT et al
| NATHANIEL LAMBRIGHT |
| D. NEAL, D. MASTERS, WENDY KNIGHT, CHARLES HOUCHINS, DOER, JOHN CRAWFORD, ERIC BLATTNER and J. POWELL |
| WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2014cv01234 |
| July 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ENTRY Dismissing Amended Complaint and Directing Entry of Final Judgment: The amended complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/17/2014.(DW)
|
|
Filing
11
ENTRY Discussing Complaint, Dismissing Insufficient Claims, And Directing Further Proceedings: Because Lambright is a "prisoner" as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h), this Court has an obligation under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b) to screen his complaint before service on the defendants, and must dismiss the complaint if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim for relief, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immu ne from such relief. The claim against Superintendent Wendy Knight is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The claim against Sgt. Neal is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons explained above, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as to any of the defendants and must therefore be dismissed pursuant to § 1915A. The dismissal of the complaint will not in this instance lead to the dismissal of the action at present. Instead, Lambright shall have through November 19, 2014, in which to file an amended complaint which corrects the deficiencies noted in Part II of this Entry. Failure to file an amended complaint as directed herein will result in the dismissal of the action for the reasons stated in this Entry (see Entry for additional information). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/21/2014.(SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
