CARTER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
Plaintiff: RICHARD B. CARTER
Defendant: CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and ANTWON E. KEYES
Case Number: 1:2014cv01845
Filed: November 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE - This cause is before the Court on the Defendants' motions in limine (Dkt. Nos. 74 & 92 ). The motions are fully briefed and the Court, being duly advised, resolves them as set forth below. (See Order.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/23/2016. (BRR)
July 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the Plaintiff's Monell claim against Defendant City of Indianapolis and state law false arrest claim against Keyes in his personal capacity and is DENIED with respect to all other claims against the Defendants (See Order). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 7/18/2016. (CBU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CARTER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICHARD B. CARTER
Represented By: Travis W. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Represented By: Beth Ann Garrison
Represented By: Ameen R. Najjar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE #1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE #2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Represented By: Beth Ann Garrison
Represented By: Ameen R. Najjar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTWON E. KEYES
Represented By: Beth Ann Garrison
Represented By: Ameen R. Najjar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?