MATYSIK v. JUDD TRANSPORTATION, LLC. et al
MICHAEL MATYSIK |
JUDD TRANSPORTATION, LLC. and BRETT LARSEN |
1:2014cv01889 |
November 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Denise K. LaRue |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 99 Motion to serve 6 additional interrogatories relating to his punitive damages claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 3/9/2016. (CBU) |
Filing 98 ORDER granting 92 Motion for Protective Order - Defendants have shown good cause for forbidding Plaintiff from further inquiry and discovery into Defendant Larsen's medical records, documents, images, bills, and prescription information. Acco rdingly, the Court declines Plaintiff's request to order Larsen to execute the medical authorization included in Plaintiff's First Supplemental Discovery Requests and GRANTS Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order Against Discovery Into Defendant Brett Larsen's Medical History [doc. 92 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 2/12/2016. (REO) |
Filing 83 ORDER granting 81 Motion for Extension of deadlines and denying 82 Motion to Strike contentious and superfluous language from agreed motion (See Order for discovery deadlines). Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 12/21/2015. (CBU) |
Filing 80 ORDER denying 73 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 12/15/2015. (CBU) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.