ARMSTRONG v. BAILEY

ARMSTRONG v. BAILEY

Plaintiff:	HERMAN ARMSTRONG
Defendant:	T. BAILEY
Case Number:	2:2014cv00333
Filed:	October 29, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Presiding Judge:	William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 28, 2016	Filing 36 Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment - Plaintiff Herman Armstrong, a former inmate of the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") at the Federal Correctional Institution in Terre Haute, Indiana, brought this action alleging that the defendant, Dr. T. Bailey, was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Dr. Bailey moves for summary judgment arguing that Mr. Armstrong failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies with reg ard to this claim. The defendant's motion for summary judgment [dkt 19 ] is granted. Judgment dismissing this action without prejudice shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/28/2016. (RSF)
September 1, 2015	Filing 24 Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment - Plaintiff Herman Armstrong, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in Terre Haute, Indiana, brings this action pursuant to the theory recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging that defendant Dr. T. Bailey was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Dr. Bailey has moved for summary judgment and Mr. Armstrong has failed to respond. The motion for summary judgment [dkt 19] is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/1/2015. (RSF)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 28, 2016

Filing 36 Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment - Plaintiff Herman Armstrong, a former inmate of the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") at the Federal Correctional Institution in Terre Haute, Indiana, brought this action alleging that the defendant, Dr. T. Bailey, was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Dr. Bailey moves for summary judgment arguing that Mr. Armstrong failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies with reg ard to this claim. The defendant's motion for summary judgment [dkt 19 ] is granted. Judgment dismissing this action without prejudice shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/28/2016. (RSF)

September 1, 2015

Filing 24 Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment - Plaintiff Herman Armstrong, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in Terre Haute, Indiana, brings this action pursuant to the theory recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging that defendant Dr. T. Bailey was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Dr. Bailey has moved for summary judgment and Mr. Armstrong has failed to respond. The motion for summary judgment [dkt 19] is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/1/2015. (RSF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ARMSTRONG v. BAILEY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: HERMAN ARMSTRONG
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: T. BAILEY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?