HUFF CONTRACTORS, INC. v. GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff: HUFF CONTRACTORS, INC.
Defendant: GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Case Number: 4:2014cv00098
Filed: August 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: New Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENTRY denying 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.P.12(b)(6). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/3/2015. (MAG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HUFF CONTRACTORS, INC. v. GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Represented By: Jennifer Jay Kalas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HUFF CONTRACTORS, INC.
Represented By: William Edward Jenner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?