Avnet, Inc. v. Catalyst Resource Group, LLC et al
| Avnet, Inc |
| Catalyst Resource Group, LLC and David A. Wild |
| 1:2013cv00021 |
| March 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Cedar Rapids Office |
| Linn |
| Edward J McManus |
| Jon S Scoles |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER For Entry of Judgment: The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Avnet, Inc. and against David A. Wild in the amount of Eight Hundred Twenty-Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars and Thirty-Four Cents ($827,753.34), plus post-judgment interest at the statutory rate from and after 4/17/14. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 4/24/14. (ksy)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Avnet, Inc.; denying 24 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by David A. Wild. Not later than 4/21/14, Avnet must file and serve a sworn affidavit regarding the current amount owed unde r the promissory note. By not later than 4/28/14, Wild may file a response to Avnet's affidavit. If necessary, the Court will hold a hearing on the limited issue of the amount owed on the promissory note. After the amount owed is established, the Court will order entry of judgment in favor of Avnet and against Wild on the guaranty. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 4/14/14. (ksy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
