Doe v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: William T Doe
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2013cv00040
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: Iowa Northern District Court
Office: Cedar Rapids Office
County: Linn
Presiding Judge: Edward J McManus
Referring Judge: Jon S Scoles
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 3 Complaint filed by William T Doe: The Court finds that the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. It is therefore ordered affirmed. Signed by Senior Judge Edward J McManus on 12/20/2013. (skm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William T Doe
Represented By: Thomas A Krause
Represented By: Hugh M Field
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.