Heiden v. Unknown Deputy Clerk et al
||Unknown Deputy Clerk, Hamilton County Clerks Office and Hamilton County, Iowa
||April 1, 2013
||Iowa Northern District Court
||Central Division Office
||Mark W Bennett
||Leonard T Strand
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 11, 2013
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER granting 1 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Wade Heiden. The clerk's office is directed to file the complaint without the prepayment of the filing fee. The plaintiff is directed to submit an i nitial partial filing fee of $6.76 by no later than July 31, 2013. Until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full, the plaintiff is obligated to pay and the institution having custody of him is obligated to forward 20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his account eachtime the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. The clerks office is directed to send a copy of this order and the notice of collection of filing fee to the appropriate official at the place where the pl aintiff is an inmate. The plaintiffs 42 USC Section 1983 actions is dismissed pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915(e)(2)(B). The dismissal of the instant action counts against the plaintiff for purposes of the three-dismissal rule. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 7/11/13. (copy w/NEF mailed to plaintiff; copy to Warden of US Penintentiary, Leavenworth, KS; copy to CR Financial) (djs)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.