Newbrough v. Bishop Heelan Catholic Schools et al
David Newbrough |
Bishop Heelan Catholic Schools, Diocese of Sioux City, Ralph Nickless and Dan Ryan |
5:2013cv04114 |
December 5, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Western Division Office |
Woodbury |
Mark W Bennett |
Leonard T Strand |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Counts I, III, IV and V in Plaintiff's Complaint. Those Counts are all dismissed. The 38 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is hereby denied as to Counts I, III, IV and V in Plaintiff 39;s Complaint. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state-law claim of religious discrimination in violation of the ICRA, Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint. That Count is hereby dismissed without prejudice. This case is closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 2/23/2015. (skm) |
Filing 37 ORDER re 25 Resistance to Defendant's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by David Newbrough: Not later than 1/20/2015, Plaintiff must re-file his motion for partial summary judgme nt in compliance with LR 7e. Furthermore, Plaintiff must respond by that date to Defendants' statements of material facts, with appropriate citations to the record (see text of Order). Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 1/13/2015. (skm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.