Maloy v. Community 1st Credit Union 457(f) Retention Plan et al

Plaintiff: Terry E Maloy
Defendant: Community 1st Credit Union 457(f) Retention Plan and Community 1st Credit Union Board of Directors
Case Number: 4:2012cv00390
Filed: August 24, 2012
Court: Iowa Southern District Court
Office: Central Office
County: Wapello
Presiding Judge: Ronald E. Longstaff
Referring Judge: Ross A. Walters
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
Cause of Action: 29:1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maloy v. Community 1st Credit Union 457(f) Retention Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry E Maloy
Represented By: Matthew D Jacobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Community 1st Credit Union 457(f) Retention Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Community 1st Credit Union Board of Directors
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.