Union Pacific System Federation of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Plaintiff: Union Pacific System Federation of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 2:2008cv02401
Filed: September 3, 2008
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Labor: Railway Labor Act Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: John W. Lungstrum
Referring Judge: K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 45:151 Railway Labor Act

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Union Pacific System Federation of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Union Pacific System Federation of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Represented By: Christopher H. Leach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.