Crawford v. Social Rehabilitation Services of Wyandotte County, Kansas et al
| Brismaegi A. Crawford |
| Paul Green, Social Rehabilitation Services of Wyandotte County, Kansas and Bill Dow |
| 2:2012cv02479 |
| July 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Wyandotte |
| Sam A. Crow |
| K. Gary Sebelius |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The plaintiff's "Notice of RE-Appeal" (Dk. 13) and response (Dk. 15) are denied as motions for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). See attached for more details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/30/2012. Mailed to pro se party: Ms. Brismaegi A. Crawford, 5480 Woodstock Street, Shawnee, KS 66218 by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 70111570000262656195 and regular mail.(bmw)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and on Eleventh Amendment immunity grounds; and the plaintiff's renewed request for appointment of counsel (Dk. 8) is denied. See attached for more details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 8/22/2012. Mailed to pro se party: Ms. Brismaegi A. Crawford, 5480 Woodstock Street, Shawnee, KS 66218 by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 70082810000136784489 and by regular mail.(bmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
