Gerbino v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
| Paul Gerbino |
| Starburst II, Inc., Starburst III, Inc., William R. Nuti, Rodney O'Neal, Starburst I, Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation, Robert R. Bennett, Gordon M. Bethune, Larry S. Glasscock, James H. Hance, Jr., Daniel R. Hesse, V. Janet Hill, Frank Ianna and Sven-Christer Nilsson |
| 2:2012cv02722 |
| November 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Karen M. Humphreys |
| Carlos Murguia |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part without prejudice The Starburst Defendants' 34 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) or, Alternatively, to Dismiss or Stay Case Pursuant to the Colorado River Doctrine, and The Sprint Defendants' 37 Motion to Dismiss or Stay Plaintiff's Corrected Amended Complaint. Further, denying without prejudice as moot, plaintiff Gerbino's 54 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. All pending motions in Steinberg are also denied without prejudice as moot. The parties must notify this court in writing within thirty days of the final disposition of the consolidated cases pending in state court. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 5/31/2013. (mg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
