Gusewelle v. Berrien
Plaintiff: Anne E. Gusewelle
Defendant: Jacqueline A. Berrien
Case Number: 2:2014cv02182
Filed: April 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: Teresa J. James
Presiding Judge: Carlos Murguia
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 794
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting defendant's 16 Motionto Dismiss Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The case is dismissed without prejudice, and the hearing set for 05/28/2014, is cancelled. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 05/23/2014. (mg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gusewelle v. Berrien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacqueline A. Berrien
Represented By: Christopher Allman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anne E. Gusewelle
Represented By: Michael A. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?