Qualls v. The CBE Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ebony Qualls
Defendant: The CBE Group, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2015cv02635
Filed: March 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: John W. Lungstrum
Presiding Judge: James P. O'Hara
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. The court finds good cause to enter the proposed protective order submitted by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 5/18/2015. (ah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Qualls v. The CBE Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ebony Qualls
Represented By: Kirk D. Holman
Represented By: Kenneth D. Kinney
Represented By: Thomas F. Ralston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The CBE Group, Inc.
Represented By: J. Randall Coffey
Represented By: Melody Lorrain Rayl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?