Balderes v. Kansas, State of

Balderes v. Kansas, State of

Plaintiff:	Daniel M. Balderes
Defendant:	Kansas, State of
Case Number:	5:2013cv03057
Filed:	March 27, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office:	Topeka Office
County:	Sedgwick
Presiding Judge:	Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 2, 2019	Filing 11 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to seal case 10 is denied. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/02/19. Mailed to pro se party Daniel M. Balderes by regular mail. (smnd)
November 19, 2013	Filing 7 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 5 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, subject to plaintiff's timely payment of an initial partial filing fee of $11.00. The State of Kansas is dismissed as a party defendant. Plaint iff's motion 2 for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days to show cause why the revised complaint should not be summarily dismissed as stating no claim for relief against the remaining two defendants. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/19/2013. (Mailed to pro se party Daniel M. Balderes by regular mail.) (smnd)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 2, 2019

Filing 11 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to seal case 10 is denied. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/02/19. Mailed to pro se party Daniel M. Balderes by regular mail. (smnd)

November 19, 2013

Filing 7 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 5 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, subject to plaintiff's timely payment of an initial partial filing fee of $11.00. The State of Kansas is dismissed as a party defendant. Plaint iff's motion 2 for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days to show cause why the revised complaint should not be summarily dismissed as stating no claim for relief against the remaining two defendants. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/19/2013. (Mailed to pro se party Daniel M. Balderes by regular mail.) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Balderes v. Kansas, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel M. Balderes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kansas, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?