Harvey v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
| Walter Lee Harvey |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Missouri Department of Corrections and United States Justice Department |
| 5:2013cv03188 |
| October 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This action is dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim and counts as a strike against Plaintiff Harvey. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 07/16/14. Mailed to pro se party Walter Lee Harvey by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days in which to submit to the court an initial partial filing fee of $30.50. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Within the same thirty-day period, plaintiff is required to cure the deficiencies in his complaint. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/31/2013. (Mailed to pro se party Walter Lee Harvey by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
