Hershey v. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Plaintiff: Jimmie Hershey
Defendant: ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Case Number: 6:2007cv01300
Filed: September 26, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Wichita Office
County: Stevens
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Humphreys
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 420 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 413 plaintiff class's Motion for Appeal Bond. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/4/2013. (mss)
October 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 406 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 10/26/2012. (mss)
October 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 355 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 323 Objector Keith Farrar's Motion for Discovery. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 10/5/2012. (mss)
October 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 351 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 310 Farrar class Motion for Reconsideration; denying 319 Farrar class Motion for Order; and denying 310 Farrar class Motion for Hearing. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 10/3/2012. (mss)
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 312 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 216 Farrar class members' Motion to Intervene. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 9/5/2012. (mss)
August 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 307 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 291 Farrar Class Representatives' Motion to Intervene; denying 295 Farrar Class Representatives' Motion for Partial Dissolution; and denying 297 Farrar Class Representatives' Motion to Expedite. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 8/24/2012. (mss)
April 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 207 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 157 plaintiff's Motion for Order. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 4/11/2012. (mss)
December 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 182 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 137 Motion to Intervene. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/21/2011. (mss)
March 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 135 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 88 Motion to Certify Class; denying 101 Motion for Hearing; overruling 123 Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge; denying as moot 125 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 132 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/31/2011. (alm)
November 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 121 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 118 Plaintiff's uncontested Motion to Strike. The clerk of the court shall take appropriate steps to strike Doc. 117 from the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 11/5/10. (sj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hershey v. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmie Hershey
Represented By: Rex A. Sharp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Represented By: Arthur S. Chalmers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?